Workspace · 02 · Cross-lingual comparison

One grammatical idea.Different linguistic systems.

Select a grammatical feature to see how each language encodes it: as a suffix, an inflectional ending, a postposition or a free particle. Slots without a verified example stay visibly empty.

Feature

More than one referent.

Languages

TURKISH

Turkic

N;NOM;PL

kediSTEM
lerNOM.PL

Strategy

Suffixation

Position: Suffix

UNIMORPH RECORD

Strategy classified automatically from the aligned base and target forms.

URDU

Indo-Aryan

N;NOM;PL

لڑکSTEM
ےNOM.PL

Strategy

Ending replacement

Position: Suffix

UNIMORPH RECORD

Strategy classified automatically from the aligned base and target forms.

EVENKI

Tungusic

N;NOM;PL

ďuSTEM
lNOM.PL

Strategy

Suffixation

Position: Suffix

UNIMORPH RECORD

Strategy classified automatically from the aligned base and target forms.

CHUKCHI

Chukotko-Kamchatkan

N;PL;ABS;ANIM

ытԓыгыSTEM
тPL.ABS.ANIM

Strategy

Absolutive singular -ын replaced by plural -(ы)т

Position: Suffix

UNIMORPH RECORD

Absolutive singular ытԓыг-ын, absolutive plural ытԓыг-ыт.

Hand annotation; not expert-reviewed.

ROMANIAN

Romance (Indo-European)

No example shown

Withheld: potential source-data inconsistency (number, adjective gender) in UniMorph ron.

Typological view · Plural
LanguageFamilyStrategyPositionEvidenceResource level
TurkishTurkicSuffixationSuffixUniMorphHigher-resource comparison
UrduIndo-AryanEnding replacementSuffixUniMorphLow-resource NLP
EvenkiTungusicSuffixationSuffixUniMorphLow-resource
ChukchiChukotko-KamchatkanAbsolutive singular -ын replaced by plural -(ы)тSuffixUniMorphLow-resource
RomanianRomance (Indo-European)n/an/anoneHigher-resource comparison

Examples are drawn from UniMorph where available; the base is the citation form unless stated. Automatic strategy labels describe surface change between two cells, not a full morphological analysis.